Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence. Ethical and Safe Implementation Practices
Executive Summary
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technology brings transformative benefits across industries, but these advances come with inherent risks. This white paper explores the mechanisms and best practices necessary to prevent AI systems from deviating from ethical and operational guidelines, ensuring robust, safe, and aligned AI deployment.
Introduction to the Risks of Rogue Behaviour in AI Systems
Artificial intelligence has revolutionized various industries by providing solutions that were previously unimaginable. However, as AI becomes increasingly pervasive, its potential risks are also growing. Some of these risks include:
Errors: Systems making decisions based on incomplete or biased training data.
Goal Misalignment: AI optimizing unintended objectives that contradict ethical or operational constraints.
Unsupervised Learning Consequences: Reinforcement learning agents developing strategies not anticipated by human designers.
Security Vulnerabilities: Exploitation of AI system flaws by malicious actors.
Lack of Human Oversight: Autonomous systems operating without sufficient human intervention.
To mitigate these risks, it is crucial to separate decision-making from implementation. This can be achieved through the use of Decision-Making and Implementation APIs (DIMA and IMA). DIMA handles core decision-making functions, while IMA applies approved decisions after rigorous assessment by Quality Assurance APIs (QAA).
The Importance of Separation of Duties (SoD) between Decision-Making and Implementation APIs (Diagram 1.0)
Separating decision-making from implementation is essential for several reasons:
Minimizing Risk of Errors or Bias: By evaluating decisions through QAA before applying them, the risk of implementing biased, unethical, or flawed decisions is reduced.
Ensuring Ethical Compliance: Before decisions are implemented, they can be rigorously assessed for compliance with ethical standards (e.g., fairness, inclusivity, and security).
Accountability and Transparency: Each API has a defined role, making it easier to identify where issues occur. For example, if the decision-making process is flawed, it’s isolated to DIMA. If implementation fails, it’s an issue with IMA.
Prevention of Unauthorized or Malicious Actions: Separating these functions reduces the likelihood that a compromised decision-making process could directly execute harmful actions.
To continue reading our white paper, please contact us…